It seems that fans are divided over the upcoming
Star Trek (2008) film. Right from the first announcement, there have been outcries and highly emotional responses regarding the various rumours. While many Star Trek fans are being quitely optimistic, there are a large number of fans who are convinced that this film will not only be bad, but the end of Star Trek as we know it. Despite constant assurances from
JJ Abrams,
Damon Lindelof and
Leonard Nimoy that Trek canon is being respected and carefully researched, people still fear a reboot that will erase all that has come before. Others feel that
William Shatner must make an appearance in the film for it to be succesful. It is ironic that the main reason the writers have had difficulty bringing Shatner into the film is that according to Canon, the older Kirk character is dead, proving that their respect for canon goes beyond mere talk.
I find all of this odd. Hasn't the philosophy of Star Trek always been an optomistic view of the future? Why then have trek fans become so cynical? Why have trek fans lost their faith?
Don't get me wrong, I care about the integrity of the Star Trek chronology as much as the next guy. I don't want to see them mess this up, and I don't know for certain that this film will live up to my expectations, but JJ Abrams & Co have demonstrated enough to earn my trust. Personally, I choose to have faith and expect the best. I choose to expect to see a great movie, with an interesting story, featuring beloved characters. Those are the things that are most important to me.
Labels: star trek